U.S. relations with many countries are governed by a series of multilateral and bilateral agreements. The duties of U.S. consular officials for the protection of U.S. citizens abroad are listed in a 1963 multilateral treaty on consular relations in Vienna, which defines the framework for consular relations between countries. The United States also has bilateral agreements with a number of countries on consular matters. You can find out more here: Bilateral Consular Conventions. The Vienna Convention on Treaty Law, which codifies several basic principles of treaty interpretation, stipulates that a treaty must be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its purpose and purpose.” It is a compromise between three different theories of interpretation: the Uniting for Peace resolution was launched by the United States in 1950, shortly after the outbreak of the Korean War, in order to circumvent possible future Soviet vetoes in the Security Council. The legal role of the resolution is clear, as the General Assembly cannot make binding decisions or codify the law. The “Seven Common Powers” that presented the draft resolution[49] in the corresponding discussions never argued that they were granting new powers to the Assembly in any way. Instead, they argued that the resolution simply indicated what the Assembly`s powers were already under the UN Charter in the event of a Security Council blockade.

[50] [51] [52] [53] The Soviet Union was the only permanent member of the Security Council to vote against the interpretations of the Charter recommended by the Assembly by the adoption of Resolution 377 A. The largest delegation that Congress has ever undertaken to the President to conclude executive agreements took place in the area of the co-decision powers of the two divisions, the field of foreign relations, and took place at a time when war was within sight and, indeed, a few months away. This Act is the Lend-Lease Act of March 11, 1941,457, which authorized the President to “authorize the Minister of War, the Minister of the Navy or the head of another government department or agency for more than two years – and later for other periods, if he deems it in the interest of national defence – to “empower the Minister of War , the Minister of the Navy or the head of another government department or agency.” , to the extent that available funds are available, “defence items” – which were then supplemented by food and industrial products – and “Sale, transfer of ownership, exchange, leasing, loan or other transfer” to “the government of any country whose defence is deemed indispensable by the President for the defence of the United States.” and all the conditions he deems “satisfactory.” As part of this authorization, the United States entered into mutual aid agreements, in which the government provided $40 billion in war munitions and other supplies to its allies during World War II. Many types of executive agreements form the ordinary daily life of the diplomatic mill. These include . B for minor territorial adjustments, border corrections, border surveillance, regulation of fishing rights, requests for private money against another government or its nationals, “simple private rights of sovereignty.” 467 Crandall lists a large number of such agreements with other governments with the president`s permission468. In addition, there are diplomatic arrangements as old as the `protocol`, which marks a step in the negotiation of a treaty, and the modus vivendi, which is to serve as a temporary substitute for a contract.